Balintoni, I., Puşte, A., Balica, C. and. Stan, R (2002): Baia de Arieş Unit - version 1. In: Dunkl, I., Balintoni, I., Frisch, W., Hoxha, L., Janák, M., Koroknai, B., Milovanovic, D., Pamić, J., Székely, B. and Vrabec, M. (Eds.): Metamorphic Map and Database of Carpatho-Balkan-Dinaride Area. http://www.met-map.uni-goettingen.de


Baia de Arieş Unit (BAA)

Version 1

Compiled: I. Balintoni, A. Puşte, C. Balica and R. Stan (2002)

Age of Protolith, Geochemistry
Lithology, Mineralogy, Metamorphic Grade
      
Thermobarometry
Geochronology
Structural Evolution
Summary
Bibliography
Links

Definition

The Baia de Arieş Unit consists of passive continental margin lithologies, of unknown protolith age, intruded by the Vinţa granitoid, the Late Cretaceous calc-alkaline "Banatites" and by the Tertiary extensional calc-alkaline magmas.

Metamorphosed during the pre-Variscan and Variscan orogenies in almandine-amphibolite facies, and exhumed during the Late Jurassic-Early Cretaceous time.

Geographic Position

The Baia de Arieş Unit crops out as a strip along the Aries Valley, in the Trascău Mountains, north-south oriented near the eastern border of the Apuseni Mountains and as a little patch in the eastern part of the Highiş-Drocea massif, the south-western termination of the Apuseni Mountains. Balintoni, (in Rusu et al., 1983), opined that the Preluca crystalline, located 100 km north of Baia de Arieş easternmost appearances in the Apuseni Mountains, belongs to the Baia de Arieş Unit, too.

Maps

Geological Map of Romania 1:1.000.000 (Săndulescu et al., 1978)
Geological Map of Romania 1:200.000, Turda sheet (Lupu et al., 1967) and Brad sheet (Bleahu et al., 1967)
Geological Map of Romania 1:50:000, the sheets Avram Iancu (Dimitrescu et al., 1977), Câmpeni, (Dimitrescu et al., 1974), Poşaga (Balintoni et al., 1987), Valea Ierii (Hârtopanu et al.
, 1982), Abrud (Bordea et al., 1979), Blăjeni (Bordea, Constantinescu, 1975), Preluca (Rusu et al., 1983).
Additional map: Balintoni, 1985

Boundaries

To the south, the Baia de Arieş Unit is covered by the Upper Cretaceous Gosau-type post-tectogenetic sequence or by the Transylvanides. To the north, the boundary is formed by the sequences of the Biharia, Paiuseni and Vulturese-Belioara Units, located in the middle part of the Biharia Nappe System. The Preluca crystalline is surrounded by Paleogene deposits of the Transylvanian Depression. We can suppose that the Baia de Arieş Unit goes to the margin of Mures suture, situated between the Tisia block and Getic (Dacia) craton.

Structural Position

The Baia de Arieş Unit constitutes the basement of the Uppermost nappe from the Biharia Nappe System, the Baia de Arieş Nappe.

Subunits

The Baia de Arieş Unit crops out in the basement of the Baia de Arieş Nappe and as a little fragment in an Austrian Transylvanide – the Colţu Trascăului Nappe (Balintoni, Iancu, 1986). This fragment has been a part of an island located in the penninic rift. The island has been destroyed during the Austrian Transylvanides emplacement, and the mentioned fragment is found in the Trascău mountains. A few less fragments are also known in the south-western prolongation of the Transylvanides stack. Balintoni, (in Rusu et al., 1983), considered the Baia de Arieş Unit succession from Preluca massif as a part of the Baia de Arieş Unit and Nappe too.

Correlation

Kräutner (1988), proposed a correlation of the Baia de Arieş sequence with lithologies of Murides (Middle Austro-Alpine), Western Carpathians (Klenovec zone, or Kokava Group, according to Dimitrescu, 1998), East Carpathians and South Carpathians (Carpian Supergroup Cp5 and Cp6, inclusive the Lainici Păiuş Group of the Danubian domain) and Pt3.1 plus Pt3.2 of Rhodopian Supergroup. We can not confirm such correlation without protolith ages and without arguments for a common tectonic setting of these rock piles, yet considering the lithology as well as the metamorphic history, the Baia de Aries Unit resembles indeed both the Rebra Unit from East Carpathians and Fagaras Unit from South Carpathians.

Age of Protolith, Geochemistry

Isotopic protolith age were not obtained till present, and Dimitrescu (1988) cited contradictory palynologic data (Early Proterozoic or Devonian). Pană (1998) tried to characterize the marbles from Baia de Arieş Unit using the 13C and 18O isotopes. His data (+1 to +3 for carbon and 19.5 to 23.7 for oxygen), suggest metamorphosed marine limestones of Precambrian – Cambrian age. Mârza (1969) mentions a few orthoamphibolites and porphyroids as metamagmatites. Such rocks are also represented in the Preluca Massif. But the Baia de Arieş Unit lithology is dominated by marbles and micaschists, specific for a passive continental margin sedimentary environment.

Lithology, Mineralogy, Metamorphic Grade

The Baia de Arieş Unit is composed of great lithons of carbonate rocks, mica-plagioclase gneisses (named also paragneisses), micaschists, graphite quartzites and schists, white quartzites, and subordinate appear amphibolites and metaporphyroids as metamorphosed acidic vulcanics. Iancu and Balintoni, (1986), discussed the metamorphic parageneses connected to the metamorphic evolution. These authors cited the following paragenetic successions:

staurolite, biotite I, garnet I, kyanite, plagioclase, muscovite I, quartz;

garnet II, biotite II, muscovite II, sillimanite, plagioclase, quartz;

phengite, chlorite, albite, epidot - clinozoisite, quartz.

These minerals have been only microscopically studied and the chemical variations from a generation to another are difficult to record. For the second mineral generation the sillimanite formation on biotite is quite clear (Mârza, 1969). A part from biotite I transforms in muscovite II. With the second mineral generation is associated an incipient anatexis too, and pegmatite formation. Finally, the third mineral generation indicates a retrogressive event toward the chlorite zone of the greenschist facies.
As a summary the following metamorphic model can be considered.
The Baia de Arieş Unit has been metamorphosed for the first time in the staurolite – kyanite zone of the almandine amphibolite facies. The age of this ev
ent is not known. Later, the system temperature arisen and probably its pressure decreased. This event should be correlated with the Devonian collision between the Biharia and Someş Units. We do not have indications for another time interval of Apuseni Mountains crystalline terranes collage. Thus, the Late Variscan Orogeny was not recorded by the Baia de Arieş Unit. The Vinţa granitoid is Permian or Late Triassic (Pană, 1998), and the 40Ar/39Ar ages are Alpine (Dallmeyer et al., 1999). The retrogressive mineral generation can be linked with the Mesozoic evolution of the Preapulian craton penninic margin, and the Early Cretaceous overthrusting. The bottom of the Baia de Arieş Nappe arose in the crust above the 500ºC isotherm during the Late Jurassic - Early Cretaceous (Dallmeyer et al., 1999).

Thermobarometry

Pană (1998) tried the Anovitz and Essene (1987) thermometer for the marbles and he obtained 573°C as metamorphic peak temperature. The same author used the Thompson (1976) garnet - biotite thermometer and the GASP barometer (Ghent, 1976). The data show great variations. Thus, the pressure ranges between 3 kbars and 7 kbars, and the temperature ranks between 550°C and 750°C. The cause for these variations consists in the complex P-T history of the Baia de Arieş Unit, evidenced by the microscopic studies. The mineral associations contains mingled, unbalanced parageneses, and also the individual mineral grains did not attain the equilibrium. The highest pressures were attained during the first metamorphic event, the highest temperatures during the second one, and the retrogressive Alpine event has not been favorable to the mineral reaction completion. The presence of kyanite admits pressures until 6-7 kbars or more during the first event, and the incipient anatexis suggests temperatures between 650°C and 750°C during the second event. A larger number of thermometric data can be found in Stumbea (2001) and Murariu (2001) got from the second metamorphic event pegmatites. These are displayed in Table 1.

Table 1. Thermometric results measured on the Baia de Arieş Unit.

Thermometer

Lithology

Mineral

Range °C

Method

Source

(min-avg-max)

Pegmatite (Preluca)

K-feldspar

445

Barth, 1962

Stumbea, 2001

Bifeldspars

Pegmatite (Preluca)

Plagioclase

350

Barth, 1962

Stumbea, 2001

Pegmatite (Preluca)

Plagioclase

470-510

Barth, 1962

Stumbea, 2001

Pegmatite (Preluca)

Plagioclase

390-450

Seck, 1971

Murariu, 2001

Pegmatite (Apuseni M.)

Plagioclase

460

Barth, 1962

Murariu, 2001

Pegmatite (Apuseni M.)

Plagioclase

400

Seck, 1971

Murariu, 2001

Pegmatite (Preluca)

Plagioclase

500-650

Barth and Orville

Murariu, 2001

Pegmatite (Apuseni M.)

Plagioclase

555-675

Barth and Orville

Murariu, 2001

Pegmatite (Preluca)

Plagioclase

450-645

Mackenzie, 1957

Murariu, 2001

Pegmatite (Apuseni M.)

Plagioclase

520-670

Mackenzie, 1957

Murariu, 2001

Pegmatite (Apuseni M.)

Vinţa granite

Muscovite

355-426-580

Eugster and Yoder, 1955

Stumbea, 2001

Muscovite - Paragonite

Pegmatite (Apuseni M.)

micaschist

Muscovite

300-425-550

Eugster and Yoder, 1955

Murariu, 2001

Pegmatite (Preluca)

Muscovite

425-444-470

Eugster and Yoder, 1955

Murariu, 2001

Pegmatite (Preluca)

Muscovite

425-560

Guidotti et al., 1994

Murariu, 2001

Pegmatite (Preluca)

Muscovite

425-475

Eugster and Yoder, 1955

Murariu, 2001

Pegmatite (Apuseni M.)

Vinţa granite

Muscovite

448-560

Eugster and Yoder, 1955

Murariu, 2001

Pegmatite (Apuseni M.)

Vinţa granite

Muscovite

448-650

Guidotti et al., 1994

Murariu, 2001

Micaschist (Preluca)

Muscovite

425-430

Eugster and Yoder, 1955

Murariu, 2001

Micaschist (Preluca)

Muscovite

425-430

Guidotti et al., 1994

Murariu, 2001

Micaschist (Apuseni M.)

Muscovite

538

Eugster and Yoder, 1955

Murariu, 2001

Micaschist (Apuseni M.)

Muscovite

650

Guidotti et al., 1994

Murariu, 2001

Pegmatite (Preluca)

Biotite

570-670

Oftedahl, 1943

Murariu, 2001

Scandium

Pegmatite (Preluca)

Biotite

580-675

Dogelaiski and Krîlova, 1973

Murariu, 2001

biotite content

Micaschist (Preluca)

Biotite

550

Oftedahl, 1943

Murariu, 2001

Micaschist (Preluca)

Biotite

520

Dogelaiski and Krîlova, 1973

Murariu, 2001

Mg/(Mg+Fe+Mn) in the garnet-biotite

Micaschist (Preluca)

Garnet+Biotite

590-650

Murariu, 2001

system or garnet staurolite system

Micaschist (Preluca)

Garnet+Biotite

522-588

p = 6.5-6.7 kb

Perciuk and Lavranteva, 1983

Radu et al., 1977 in Murariu, 2001

Micaschist (Preluca)

Garnet+Stau.

522-533

Hodges and Spear, 1984

Radu et al., 1977 in Murariu, 2001

Fe/(Fe+Mg)

Pegmatite (Preluca)

Biotite

545-570

Wones and Engster, 1965

Murariu, 2001

in biotite

Micaschist (Preluca)

Biotite

585

Wones and Engster, 1965

Murariu, 2001

Gneiss (Preluca)

Biotite

610

Wones and Engster, 1965

Murariu, 2001

Lithium

Pegmatite (Preluca)

Biotite

615-640

Pomârleanu and Movileanu, 1977

Murariu, 2001

biotite content

Metamorphics (Preluca)

Biotite

620

Pomârleanu and Movileanu, 1977

Murariu, 2001

Thermocalc

Micaschist (Preluca)

Garnet+Biotite

600-603

p = 6.0 kb

Powell and Holland, 1988

Radu et al., 1977 in Murariu, 2001

From these data we can conclude that during the second metamorphic event the temperature ranged between 600°C and 700°C. The incipient anatexis appeared, favoring the extensive pegmatite formation, especially in the Preluca Massif. In this area, the metamorphic minerals statically recrystallized and the rock fisility drastically diminished. Many pegmatite bodies transversely cut the layering, indicating extensional deformation during their genesis. The Vinţa pegmatites are located within Vinţa granitoid. They are not related to the second metamorphic event. According to thermobarometry data, the second metamorphic event circumscribes in the kyanite - sillimanite transition zone of the almandine amphibolite facies.

Geochronology

U/Pb, Sm/Nd and 40Ar/39Ar data were performed by Pană (1998) and Dallmeyer et al. (1999). These are listed in Table 2.

Table 2. Geochronologic data obtained on Baia de Arieş Unit

Location

Lithology

Method

Age (TDM Ga)

Source

Cioara Valley

Gneiss – Grt.

Sm/Nd WR

1.71

Pană, 1998

Sălciua

Gneiss – Grt.

Sm/Nd WR

1.82

Pană, 1998

Vinţa

Granite (261 Ma?)

Sm/Nd WR

1.65

Pană, 1998

Surduc

Gneiss – Grt.

Sm/Nd WR

1.69

Pană, 1998

Age (Ma)

Vinţa

Granite

U/Pb zircon

261?, 211?

Pană, 1998

(206/207 discordia)

Plateau age (Ma)

Isotope correlation age

Total gas age

Cioara Valley

Micachist

40Ar/39Ar Ms

116.9

-

116.9

Dallmeyer et al., 1999

Sartăş

Amphibolite

40Ar/39Ar Hbl

118.2

-

124.2

Dallmeyer et al., 1999

Sartăş

Gneiss

40Ar/39Ar Ms

110.7

-

111.9

Dallmeyer et al., 1999

Sălciua de Sus

Amphibolite

40Ar/39Ar Hbl

119

115

133.4

Dallmeyer et al., 1999

Surduc

Amphibolite

40Ar/39Ar Hbl

155.5

151

167.2

Dallmeyer et al., 1999

Băişoara

Phylonite

40Ar/39Ar WR

-

-

118.8

Dallmeyer et al., 1999

WR: whole rock, Hbl: hornblende, Ms: muscovite

Structural Evolution

Genetic tectonic setting. As a passive continental margin sequence, the Baia de Arieş Unit should have a continental crust basement. We do not know its basement because the Baia de Arieş Unit represents a relative thin geological body located in an Alpine nappe.

Plates and metamorphic events. During the first metamorphic event, the Baia de Arieş Unit probably was attached to a lower plate. Arguments for this reasoning can be: the absence of the granite and migmatite generation, the relative high pressure indicated by the staurolite and kyanite formation. During the second metamorphic event, the Baia de Arieş Unit could be in an upper plate position. A higher temperature (sillimanite appearance, incipient anatexis) combined with a lower pressure (cordierite presence, Ghergari, pers. comm. 2002), pleads in this sense. The second metamorphic event can be correlated with the Paleozoic amalgamation of the Someş, Biharia and Baia de Arieş terranes. The Late Carboniferous - Permian extension was located especially within the Biharia terrane. Partly, the metamorphic retrogression was associated with the Variscan Orogeny, but the isotopic ages does not conserve than Alpine influence. Excepting a Late Jurassic age, the other 40Ar/39Ar ages (Dallmeyer et al. 1999) show an Early Cretaceous exhumation and cooling.
We mention that the "Tethysian extension" individualized the Preapulian craton and its penninic margin has been represented by the Baia de Arieş Unit rocks. The
40Ar/39Ar data did not registered the "Tethysian extension" yet the marginal position of the Baia de Arieş Unit was important for its role of parautochthonous for the Transylvanides overthrusting. During the Late Jurassic - Early Cretaceous contractional period, the Preapulian craton was situated in an upper plate position regarding the Getic craton. At the end of the contractional period, a new extensional tectonics permitted the emplacement of the Late Cretaceous calc-alkaline "Banatitic" suite.

Structural geology. The Baia de Arieş Unit rocks are strong foliated and folded. The prominent foliation is a transposed one, yet as in many Carpathian situations, it is parallel to the lithons. The folding is well visible in the carbonate rocks. The foliation transposition and folding appear to be associated with the beginning of the second metamorphic event.
During the Early Cretaceous time the Transylvanides overthrust the Baia de Arieş crystalline (the Austrian tectogenesis), and further the Baia de Arieş crystalline has been involved in the pre-Gosau tectogenesis, as the uppermost uni
t of the Biharia Nappe System. Before the Cretaceous period ending, the Transylvanides together with their basement were thrust and folded again (the Laramian tectogenesis).

Summary

The Baia de Arieş Unit represents a passive continental margin suite of unknown protolith age. When it was first time metamorphosed follows to be found. The second metamorphic event can be connected with the probable Devonian amalgamation of the Someş, Biharia and Baia de Arieş Units. It was weaker affected by the late Variscan extension and were not get Variscan isotope ages from its rocks. Instead, the Alpine metamorphic imprint is quite strong on the Baia de Arieş Unit rocks. It was exhumed from middle crustal levels during the Late Jurassic - Early Cretaceous times. Because the Baia de Arieş Nappe body was hot during its emplacement, it provided the metamorphic heat to the Păiuşeni Unit and Vulturese-Belioara Unit, and favored a ductile deformation to the three Units rocks.

Bibliography

Balintoni, I. (1985): Corrélation des unites lithostratigraphiques et tectoniques longeant le ruisseau d’Aries entre la valée de Iara et le Mont Gaina (Monts Apuseni). D. S. Inst. Geol. Geofiz., LXIX/5 (1982), 5-15, Bucuresti.

Balintoni, I. (1997): Geotectonica terenurilor metamorfice din Romania. Ed. Carpatica, Cluj Napoca, 176pp.

Balintoni, I., Lupu, M., Iancu, V. and Lazar C. (1987): Geological Map of Romania sc. 1:50.000, Posaga sheet, Inst. Geol. Geofiz. Bucuresti.

Balintoni, I.and Iancu, V. (1986): Lithostratigraphic and tectonic units in the Trascau Mountains, North of Manastirea Valley. D. S. Inst. Geol. Geofiz., (1983), 70-71/5, 45-56, Bucuresti.

Bleahu, M., Savu, M. and Borcos, M. (1967): Geological Map of Romania sc. 1:200.000, Brad sheet, Geol. Inst. Bucuresti.

Bordea, S. and Constantinescu R. (1975): Geological Map of Romania sc. 1:50.000, Blajeni sheet, Inst. Geol. Geofiz. Bucuresti.

Bordea, S., Stefan, A. and Borcos, M. (1979): Geological Map of Romania sc. 1:50.000, Abrud sheet, Inst. Geol. Geofiz. Bucuresti.

Dallmeyer, R. D., Pana, D., Neubauer, F.and Erdmer, P. (1999): Tectonothermal evolution of the Apuseni Mountains, Romania: Resolution of Variscan versus Alpine events with 40Ar/39Ar ages. Journal of Geology, 107, 329-352.

Dimitrescu, R. (1988): Apuseni Mountains. In: V. Zoubek (ed.). Precambrian in younger fold belts. John Wiley&Sons, New York, 853-862.

Dimitrescu, R., Bleahu, M. and Lupu, M. (1977): Geological Map of Romania sc. 1:50.000, Avram Iancu sheet, Inst. Geol. Geofiz. Bucuresti.

Dimitrescu, R., Bordea, J. and Bordea, S. (1974): Geological Map of Romania sc. 1:50.000, Campeni sheet, Inst. Geol. Geofiz. Bucuresti.

Hartopanu, I., Hartopanu, P., Balintoni, I., Borcos, M., Rusu, A. and Lupu, M. (1982): Geological Map of Romania sc. 1:50.000, Valea Ierii sheet, Inst. Geol. Geofiz. Bucuresti.

Iancu, V. and Balintoni, I. (1986): The mineral assemblages and parageneses in the metamorphics of the Baia de Aries Group – Apuseni Mountains. In: Mineral Parageneses, 473-493, Teophrastus Publications, Athens.

Kräutner, H. G. (1988): Interregional correlations. In: V. Zoubek (ed.). Precambrian in younger fold belts. John Wiley&Sons, New York, 853-862.

Lupu, M., Borcos, M., Dimian, M., Lupu, D. and Dimitrescu, R. (1967): Geological Map of Romania sc. 1:200.000, Turda sheet, Geol. Inst. Bucuresti.

Marza, I. (1969): Evolutia unitatilor cristaline din sud-estul Muntelui Mare. Ed. Acad. Rom., Bucuresti, 166p.

Murariu, T. (2001): Geochimia pegmatitelor din Romania. Ed. Acad. Rom., Bucuresti, 356p.

Pana, D. (1998): Petrogenesis and tectonics of the basement rocks of the Apuseni Mountains: significance for the Alpine tectonics of the Carpatho-Pannonian region. PhD Thesis, University of Alberta, Canada, 356pp.

Rusu, A., Balintoni, I., Bombita, G. and Popescu, G. (1983): Geological Map of Romania sc. 1:50.000, Preluca sheet, Inst. Geol. Geofiz. Bucuresti.

Sandulescu, M., Kräutner, M., Borcos, M., Nastaseanu, S., Patrulius, D., Stefanescu, M., Ghenea, C., Lupu, M., Savu, H., Bercia, I. and Marinescu, F. (1978): Geological Map of Romania, sc. 1:1.000.000, Inst. Geol. Geofiz. Bucuresti.

Stumbea, D. (2001): Geochimia pegmatitelor din sudul Gilaului. Ed. Univ. "A. I. Cuza", Iasi, 266pp.

Links

Descriptions of the neighbouring Units:

Biharia Unit (BHA)
Păiuşeni Unit (PAA)
Somes Unit (SOA)
Vulturese - Belioara Unit (VBA)

======================

Show the "Pin-board" of this Unit.

Send letter to the Responsible Compiler with suggestions.

Submit "Pin-board Article" about this Unit

Download this Description in PDF format

Met-Map Home